Abortion Rights

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Anti-choice minister for women

Abortion Rights is disappointed in today's appointment of a Minister for Women who has a clear history of anti-choice voting. Nicky Morgan, MP for Loughborough, voted in favour of Nadine Dorries' 2011 proposed amendment to the Health and Social Care Bill, which would have disallowed bpas and Marie Stopes from providing counselling to pregnant persons and forced women to seek "independent" counselling. "Independent" included faith-based and/or anti-choice organisations such as crisis pregnancy centres. This proposed amended highlighted the lack of respect and trust that the anti-choice movement has for women and pregnant persons. It was, luckily, defeated. 
Pregnancy termination is a medical service 1 in 3 women in the UK will need in their reproductive lifetime, and over 75% of the UK are pro-choice. We are deeply concerned that the Cameron government has appointed a Minister for Women who does not support the full range of reproductive health care required by many. It is unclear if MP Morgan's anti-choice position is an oversight or an active selection by Cameron, however both options cast doubt on the seriousness of the government's commitment to reproductive rights and healthcare. We truly hope MP Morgan will put her personal views aside in order to represent the needs of pregnant persons across the UK as well as the pro-choice majority. 
Casey Burchell



Abortion Law Reformed by Keith Hindell & Madeleine Simms



Abortion Law Reformed


Keith Hindell & Madeleine Simms


New Edition 2012


This remarkable story of how a small group brought about a major change in the law has been re-issued as a Print on Demand paperback in association with Amazon Books.


The Abortion Act of 1967 was a milestone on the road to female equality – in effect it has made motherhood voluntary. It has given pregnant women in Britain the opportunity to terminate their pregnancies under proper medical conditions. It has also prompted much medical innovation in surgical techniques, day care and in abortifacient drugs, so that abortion is now actually a safer option than childbirth.  Over the 46 years since the Act came into effect in Britain some 7 million abortions have been performed within the law, becoming a significant factor in slowing population growth and enabling many young women to postpone child rearing and stay longer in the work force.


This new paperback edition is almost identical to the original of 1971 containing all the text and all the photographs. Only the cover and the price are different.  We commend this unchallenged account of how the law was changed, to medical and law schools, to practitioners and administrators of abortion units in and out of the NHS, as well as to political scientists, historians, sociologists and all students of gender politics.


Keith Hindell  is a retired BBC correspondent

Madeleine Simms, a former General Secretary of the Abortion Law Reform Association,  died in 2011. 

Abortion Law Reformed new edition is published by Peter Owen and   can be obtained from www.Amazon.co.uk

Contact: Michael O’Connell  020 8350 1775

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Keith Hindell 020 8670 7790  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


Dirty Dancing

images-1 18.38.19

I carried a watermelon, she had a backstreet abortion: how Dirty Dancing broke new ground on the big screen

Ever question how come we never see realistic portrayals of abortion in film?  Abortion Rights is screening one very famous movie that gets it right, Dirty Dancing so much more than just a chick flick! 

Please  join us on Tuesday the 4th of Febuary at the whirled cinema  

the screening  will be followed by a panel discussion on the representation of abortion in the media. 


₤5.00 concessions 

You will be asked to provide proof of purchase at the event.

for more information please contact This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .uk


Abortion Rights letter of solidarity with Victoria women

Abortion Rights statement of solidarity with Victorian (Australia) women


Abortion Rights fully supports the Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 in its entirety, including Section 8. We denounce any and all recent attempts by a tiny minority of anti-choice doctors to reverse any aspect of the Act. In particular, we are appalled that at least one registered medical doctor has broken the law by not referring women patients seeking a termination.


Victoria’s law is simple and explicit as to what is required of doctors – the obligation to refer to a medical practitioner who does not have a conscientious objection (not necessarily an abortion provider). The obligation to refer upholds doctors’ right to conscientiously object, and modestly asks doctors to tell women the truth and to pass the patient on. In the same vein, women have the right to be told the truth and still seek medical care– their needs should not be trumped by another individual’s opinion, particularly a doctor who has registered to uphold the right to health.


The obligation to refer is standard practice in many countries worldwide; however, the British 1967 Abortion Act does not include the obligation to refer, and the risk this poses to British women’s health should not be underestimated.


If an individual doctor is morally opposed to referrals, they are negating their legal and ethical duty of care, and inhibiting women’s right to health.


We share the belief that it is good healthcare practice and better for women to be given truthful, non-bias medical information at their request.


We offer our solidarity to those urging the Victorian Parliament to not renege on commitments already made to uphold women’s health, and to stand by Victorian women.




Executive Committee, Abortion Rights



STUC Women’s Conference Emergency motion agreed on Northern Ireland abortion access

Abortion Access in Northern Ireland

Following on from reports to the Women’s Trades Union Council of the Isles meeting in Dublin 7/8 November, Conference is very concerned about the absence of fully accessible and legal abortion services in Northern Ireland. Cases publicized early in October 2013 in the media in Northern Ireland have highlighted the unacceptable reality for many women.

Conference notes that over 1,000 women a year travel from Northern Ireland to other parts of the UK.


Conference also notes that women then have to pay for this service, free to women in all other parts of the UK under the provisions of the 1967 Abortion Act.


Further, Conference notes that the UN examining Committee on CEDAW (UN Convention to Eliminate Discrimination Against Women’ in its 2013 Report on UK progress, called on the UK as the ‘State Party’ within the United Nations,  should move immediately to decriminalize abortion in Northern Ireland and significantly extend the terms under which abortion would be legal.


Conference therefore asks the STUC Women’s Committee to work with the STUC General Council and affiliates:


  • to lobby the UK Government to comply with the UN CEDAW Committee’s recommendation
  • to write to all Scottish MPs on this matter
  • to write to the Secretary of State for Health in the UK Government urging the removal of charges for those women who travel from Northern Ireland to access services in other parts of the UK to liaise with the NICTU Women’s Committee on this issue.
  • to send a message of support to the Marie Stopes clinic now attempting to deliver a service in Belfast



Mover STUC Women’s Committee


(NOTE - this is the CEDAW UN Committee’s recommendation)


Recalling its previous recommendation, the Committee reiterates that, in line with general recommendation No. 24 on women and health and the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, the State party should expedite the amendment of the anti-abortion law in Northern Ireland with a view to decriminalise abortion. The State party should also ensure that legal abortion not only covers cases of threats to the life of a pregnant woman but also other circumstances such as threats to her health and in cases of rape, incest and serious malformation of the foetus.


Ann Henderson


Abortion: old war, new battles

Comedian Kate Smurthwaite explains why we must continue to fight for a woman's right to choose.

28 October 2013


A woman’s right to choose on abortion is a fundamental one, yet many people regard the battle for legal abortion in Britain as akin to the moon landings - something we ticked off in the sixties and don’t need to revisit. 

The reality is that our abortion law, little changed since the days of Mary Quant and Beatlemania, was never truly fit for purpose. Most glaringly abortion is still essentially illegal in Northern Ireland and today an average of forty women a week travel to other parts of the UK to terminate pregnancies. 

The price war on flights from Belfast has made these women’s lives easier, but in London or Liverpool, 'National' Health Service facilities charge them £600 to £2,000 for abortions that would be free to other British women. The law change would need to come from Stormont but the costs for Northern Irish women on the mainland is a regulatory one. The Department of Health simply refuses to budge. When women in crisis pregnancy are more grateful to Michael O’Leary than they are to Jeremy Hunt, it’s time to get a new Health Secretary. 

Abortion before twelve weeks is usually achieved with two sets of tablets taken 48 hours apart. Current regulations, not laws, mean the second set of tablets must be administered on a separate visit to a medical clinic, rather than simply handed out with the first set and instructions. Two to four hours after taking this second set of tablets a normal miscarriage occurs and, thanks to this genius piece of regulation, rather than at home where they feel safe and comfortable women are likely to miscarry in clinic toilets, public transport or the motorway hard shoulder. 

Abortion also remains the only medical procedure which requires two doctor’s signatures. You can have a brain transplant with one. Some of these anti-choice politicians should consider it. 

However, instead of working to solve these glaring problems politicians are distracted by a new breed of evangelical, in every sense, anti-choice campaigners armed with tactics copied from their US counterparts. 

The fundamentalist part of the anti-choice movement now stands outside Marie Stopes and BPAS clinics conspicuously praying or holding up graphic images of abortions which, like all medical procedures, look gross. Those of us who support a woman’s right to choose abortion rarely stand outside maternity wards with pictures of placentas. 

The 'moderate' end of the anti-choice movement prefers to derail the agenda in subtler ways, exaggerating and bewailing the notion of terminations based on the gender or disability of the foetus. This misleads because it shifts the focus to the foetus. The woman herself has evaporated. 

However much humanity and however many rights we afford an unborn foetus, the right to use another person’s body to sustain one’s own life is not on any international declarations. If it was organ donation would be compulsory and vampire films would get very dull as the ubiquitous virgins rolled over and muttered 'well I suppose you do look thirsty...'. 

Pro-choice campaigners can become complicit in this derailment when they invoke rape and incest cases to highlight the importance of abortion rights. Yes, those cases have a particular poignancy but the same logic is used to suggest HIV treatment be made available at first to those who contracted the disease through blood transfusion rather than intercourse. Consenting to sex should not diminish basic human rights. 

Whatever religious extremists would like to tell us, in our society it is not illegal for women and men, gay or straight, to have consensual, recreational sex. What is wrong is to punish women who participate by forcing them to carry and raise an unwanted child, not least because the burden of suffering inevitably falls on that child. 

The battle for a woman’s right to choose is far from won in the UK. We must continue to fight it: from discriminatory laws and clumsy regulations to street harassment and the sickening notion, thoughtlessly accepted in much public discourse, that pregnancy and parenthood can function as a penalty for sexually active women. 

Kate Smurthwaite is a comedian and political activist www.katesmurthwaite.co.uk



Summary of changes to Ireland’s abortion law



Summary of changes to Ireland’s abortion law


The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill was passed by the Oireachtas on 11th July 2013, and on 30th July the Taoiseach Enda Kenny, Ireland’s Prime Minister, signed the Bill into law.


Members of the Dáilvoted 127 to 31 to legalise abortion in cases of medical emergencies as well as if the pregnant woman is at risk of suicide. Abortion in all other circumstances (including rape and incest) remains illegal.


The Bill includes numerous provisions that continue to restrict access to legal abortion, including stipulating that between two and three medical practitioners of varying specialties must approve the termination (except in emergency situations, wherein one physician can approve and then perform the termination). Moreover, the Bill specifies that abortions may only occur in an “appropriate institution” which only include maternity hospitals and some hospitals with emergency facilities.


Abortion Rights are concerned that these provisions, amongst others, make obtaining an abortion a very lengthy, costly and potentially stressful process for women and their families. Locational provisions disproportionality disadvantage rural women who are less able to attend an “appropriate institution”, particularly given the World Health Organisation (2008) lists abortion as one of the simplest and safest medical procedures when performed safely and legally.


Nevertheless, more than 22 years after the ‘X case’ and the promise by various Irish governments to reform and/or clarify abortion law, Irish women will now have limited access to legal terminations. Similarly, doctors now have greater clarity to guide their service provision.


However, Abortion Rights hopes that further legal advancements are made in Ireland to enable women to truly choose if and when they become parents.


According to Irish department of health figures released last week, approximately 4000 Irish women travelled to British hospitals and clinics to terminate their pregnancies last year. Given the limitations of the new law, it is predicted that many Irish women will continue to travel abroad to have their reproductive health needs met.


The Bill is now available in full

Casey Burchell 


40 Days for Choice: Speaking out against "saving" women


60 trumps 40 in London protest! 

40 Days for choice

On Tuesday 24th September, more than 60 pro-choice activists turned out in Stratford to “welcome” 40 Days for Life back to London. 40 Days are an anti-choice group who hold 40 day long vigils outside abortion clinics to try to “save” women from making their own reproductive choices.

Previous 40 Days campaigns have handed out literature to women containing outright lies about abortion, such as claims that abortion causes cancer, and direct women away from regulated reproductive health clinics such as BPAS and Marie Stops to “crisis pregnancy centres” run by the anti-choice movement.

The demonstration against the opening event of the 40 Days campaign in Stratford was organised by Bloomsbury Pro-Choice, who have previously co-ordinated pro-choice counter demonstrations against 40 Days for Life in Bloomsbury, and are working with Abortion Rights to organise actions over the next “40 Days of Choice” (see 40daysforchoiceTumblr for more information).

The 15 members of 40 Days who attended their opening event were hugely outnumbered by the lively pro-choice protest outside, showing them that whilst they may be back, so are we..

Megan Down


Global day of action for access to safe & legal abortion

In Supoort of September 28th Global Day of Action for Acess to Safe and Legal Abortion, join Abortion Rights #SEPT28 Twitter Quizathon! 


From 18th-28th, look out for the daily Q&A quiz @Abortion_Rights- Knowledge and prizes to be won! 


We ask the question around noon, you answer ASAP and the first tweeter to correctly answer wins entry into the monthly Abortion Rights Pro-Choice Lottery (for the chance to win 200 pounds)! 


AND for the grand finale, one quizmaster pro-choicer will win a bumper pack stuffed full of Abortion Rights goodies.. and eternal glory! 

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »

Page 1 of 5

php script encode google sıra bulucu kanun pagerank sorgulama seo ukash haber seo seo ukash google pagerank sorgulama